MyFox
 

NinevehDinha's Blog

by NinevehDinha from Salt Lake City, UT

Last Post 7 hours Ago


The political world is buzzing! If  you haven't heard, former press secreatary Scott McClellan is set to release his new book blasting the Bush Administration.

The title of the more than 300 page book, "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception."

In short, McClellan goes after the President on Hurricane Katrina, the CIA Leak Case and the War in Iraq. He talks about propganda.

Critics say he's just cashing in (by the way, the book has already been rated number one on Amazon.com even though it hasn't even hit store shelves.) Did he stab his former boss in the back? I'm curious to know what do you think about a book like this? Will you read it?

 

 

15 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 15
Page 1 of 1
Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 1:08 PM

sure i rather read his story of inside the White House and the War in Iraq than some analists view, you're not an analist so i can say that. What do you think?

copycapt
May 29, 2008 | 2:05 PM

I think it's crap! It's gutless and cowardly! It reminds me of the Dixie Chicks a few years back ripping on the President while they were overseas! It's just another way for him to put a nickle in his pocket!

Be a man! If you don't like something, stand up for yourself then and now! Don't wait until you quit and come out with a book later. Gutless!

4sportie read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 2:29 PM

Is this McClellan a relative of Civil War General George McClellan, the guy that Lincoln had to fire because McClellan was so inept?

Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 2:42 PM

ahhh the dixie chicks, they've done me no favors in this whole war times, they're words have fallen on deaf ears. I don't even like Texas.

Crossover read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 10:08 AM

Let’s see here… Paul O’Neill, Richard Clarke, Christine Todd Whitman, Lawrence Lindsay, L. Paul Bremer III, and now Scott McClellan. All are former Bush administration officials who have come out with books highly critical of their former boss. Oh, and let’s not forget Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame Wilson. Richard Armitage and Andrew Card have all had significant input into other people’s highly critical books or articles as well. How many people have to reveal that the Bush administration has been a fiasco before some people will accept it? Even if you think that all these people were disgruntled ask yourself this: how many disgruntled people does it take before you see a pattern?

Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 10:21 AM

..HOW many people are in the cabinet?


jkidding Crossover ;)

akiame read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 10:24 AM

The Ironic thing to me crossover is that all the rats that jumped ship are now criticizing the Administration and then the Administration turns around and Denies and Dismisses such claims as the rantings of disgruntled employees...

If Bush, himself, admitted anything... The Powers that Be would dismiss his words as the ramblings of a disgruntled chairman...

I guess my point is that The Administration is un-capable of wrong doing regardless of any factual information proving otherwise...

I think Americans just want someone that will take responsibility for their actions when they mess up... You know like the rest of us peons have to do... I think it is only fair that trusted representatives should be accountable for their actions as well. So Get some "ca hones" and take responsibility like the rest of us have to do day in and day out!

What do you expect from the most Secretive Administration in American History? The truth? That is laughable!!! All they do is deny, dismiss, shrug, roll the blame somewhere else...

That is also the problem with secrets, and lies... Even if they do end up telling the truth, their credibility is gone so no one would believe them anyway...

Mariposa_Xochipilli read my blog
May 31, 2008 | 10:28 AM

Akiame and Crossover,

You bring up a good point by using the word "disgrunted". That word is regularly used to invalidate and discredit someone's statements. The truth becomes nothing more than an afterthought.

What's wrong with a person becoming disgruntled when a doctor gives their hemopheliac child aspirin therapy ... or a kidnap victim being disgruntled at having their innocence torn away.

What is the person who calls another 'disgruntled' trying to coverup? Corruption? Waste? Fraud? Abuse? Violations of public trust?

This is how corruption works ... the person can't say anything while employed without risking losing the roof over their head and the food in their children's mouth. When they finally give up and quit or are fired, they become nothing more than a disgruntled employee. The abuses get to thrive because no reporter ever considers there is concrete proof the person is telling the truth.

richardcheney read my blog view my photos
Jun 1, 2008 | 7:45 AM

The fable about the blind men who, while all in contact with an elephant, have widely differing views about the nature of the elephant has bearing on all these "tell-all" tales told by sink-ship rats. All have a portion of reality, but none have it all, and, taken as a whole, merely by their descriptions, we still have a confusing image of what the Bush administration has really been. McClellan's book, like others, may have anecdotal significance, but little else.

Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
Jun 1, 2008 | 9:55 AM

I know everyone wants to let this blog go. but. I want to understand WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED? Maybe Scott's book will shed a few lines of truth or maybe not, but, now books are cheaper to buy than driving across town to a friends house for coffee and conversation.

MX, you were brilliant and I think there is only truth to your statement!`

Nineveh, you are once again stunning and all about a good debate. Your boyfriend has a great smile, when are you two getting married?` I'm guessing he's an emergency worker or a fireman?` (see, i can say it out loud, for you.)

CopyCapt, it's true I'll never see you again.

4sportie, you are so damn funny, you should blog me some more!`

Crossover, you fabulously opened for MX and THAT is some list.

akiame, I don't know how you pronounce your name or it's meaning, but, your blogs are always thought provoking and filled with truth!`

Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
Jun 1, 2008 | 9:58 AM

Richard, I have NO idea what you are trying to say?

Mariposa_Xochipilli read my blog
Jun 2, 2008 | 9:39 AM

Shelly,

There's a story about four blind men who describe an elephant. One just touches the trunk, another the tail, one the leg, and the other (I think) the elephant's side.
They can't see the whole picture, so each decides that their limited experience is the elephant in its entirity. They end up arguing about what an elephant looks like.

By all these people giving their own view and representing it as the entire truth ... instead of looking at the complete picture ... these former Bush cronies are saying that the tail or the ears or the feet of the 'elephant' is the entire elephant. They are only parts.

Does that help?

Crossover read my blog view my photos
Jun 2, 2008 | 11:13 AM

I would like to point out that Richard does have a valid point if you look at each book individually. However, a more complete image of this presidency emerges if the books are treated as a whole. In other words, just because each blind man assigns different characteristics to the elephant that doesn’t mean that any of them are incorrect. Indeed we know that an elephant does have the individual qualities that each blind man assigns to it. What the blind men are lacking is the proper perspective to put all the parts together. Historians will probably compare these books and look for commonalities that they all share, and areas in which they are in disagreement. In that way the blind may see, and we can use their eyes to see for ourselves as well.

The big question to ask at this point is who in this administration has the perspective to put all the parts together, and is it the one who should be able to?

Shelly13 read my blog view my photos
Jun 2, 2008 | 10:09 PM

oh yeah, Richard said it...hahaha bubble bubble bubble ;)

YyinYyangMan read my blog view my photos
Jun 4, 2008 | 4:37 PM

I for one am happy to see someone with his level of involvment coming forward (and cashing in). I sincerely doubt however that his book will be a 'tell all'. Among multiple others in Washington that have 'come forward' I agree with R.Cheney that his book will be a mere aspect of the 'elephant'. From what I've seen in the book stores and online there must be a hundred books written by reputable people telling about the betrayl and devastation of the Bush administration, along with a four hour publicly televised documentary of the Bush administration called 'Bush's War' by Frontline/PBS. With all this information in the public scope I think its clear that there are many people beggining to open their eyes to the stampeding elephant. As well I think its a sign that there is still a majority clenching their eyes shut following the best they can to the War-happy Bush administration. With almost a million dead so far and things looking not much better for the future I think it might be time to start handing out swastika arm bands and little fake mustaches to the Bush fanatics. For the rest of us I think its best to remember what happens when things like this go to far, like Orianenburg, Auschwitz and the millions who have died before with 'regimes' like this. Just the same as Pres. Bush, before WWII, Hitler changed laws to allow for indefinit imprisonment and torture as well as secured 'internment' camps for political opponents. Hail Bush.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




NinevehDinha

I start off every morning waking up our viewers, and it's always a pleasure! I'm happy to be part of Fox 13's Good Day Utah team. I anchor bright and early from 5 to 6 a.m. You can also catch me on the streets reporting for both GDU and Live at 11.

Member Since: 2/20/2007