MyFox
 

NinevehDinha's Blog

by NinevehDinha from Salt Lake City, UT

Last Post 1 day, 18 hours Ago


"I now expect we will, indeed, have a plan that can pass the House, pass the Senate, (and) be signed by the President." That's what Senator Bob Bennett of Utah said after a two-hour negotiating session between both parties.
 A deal on the 700 billion dollar bailout could be reached within days, even as early as tomorrow. Stocks rallied this morning following President Bush's prime time address last night. 
Meantime, jobless claims are at a 7-year high...While we don't know the details of the proposed bailout (it could be different from the administrations recommendations), it's most likely happening. The federal government will be bailing the financial market out of the mess it made. 
Questions: do you think the "bailout" is a socialistic move? Do you think a couple days is enough time to make such a big decision? Or do you believe Congress should act fast?
7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
akiame read my blog view my photos
Sep 25, 2008 | 4:38 PM

I think the Government waited this long on purpose! They waited so they could use the "Got to move now!" Ploy... Just like Iraq and weapons of mass destruction.

A metaphor would be the market collapse is a bus and the government watched it coming down the road straight for us... Instead of moving when they first seen the bus they wanted to wait so that they could push some sneaky reform through because of fear and its the very last moment to move...

The point is that the government had plenty of time to act, since the beginning of the year people have been talking about the economy crashing and the government kept lying through their teeth saying that all was well...

They wanted a short timetable so they could Sneak crooked legislation through... They wanted to wait until the last moment so everyone would be in a rush and not read the fine print.

So when it comes back to haunt us they will say "Gee you signed and supported didn't you read the fine print?"

Lame Political Ploy!!!

lifeliberty read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 5:43 PM

I also found that Bob Bennett's site would not let me e-mail him. I hit the "E-mail me" button twice and it would not work.

Hatch's e-mail worked and Rob Bishop actuall sent an automated response saying thank you for writing.

My wife got through to Bennett through another route (Senate site) and I had to call on the 'phone. I asked if Sen. Bennett believed in the free economy? The person who answered the 'phone said "I cannot answer for Senator Bennett but if you have a comment for him I will be happy to pass it on. It was all pretty snippy-sounding. I said that my message was that I didn't want any bailouts!
- I wanted to keep it simple because there was no written record for her to pass on and it wasn't an audio recording. I hoped the snippy person wrote it down or at least logged it on a chart, but I wasn't sure it was going to pass it on at all. From what I read in this blog he has apparently made his mind up already. He wants to compromise with robbers and tyrants.

trikkydevil read my blog view my photos
Sep 25, 2008 | 8:33 PM

Wow! a $700,000,000,000 mistake. I wonder where it came from? Eleven zeros
Anybody who used these companies get the memo they were spending the country into ruin? No? Okay.
Any body check the pockets of a corporate bigwig maybe? No? Okay. Maybe they should make those rich guys poor, maybe swipe a few zeros off the top of some bank accounts.
Isn't that what they do if you miss a house payment? could they work Mcdonald's to make up the difference? Maybe a little public service, perhaps? No? I didn't think so.

Mariposa_Xochipilli read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 10:37 PM

Answers: Yes, no, this should never have happened in the first place.

Apparently Senator Bennett was wrong ... and it was House Republicans who derailed whatever it was being considered.

lifeliberty read my blog
Sep 26, 2008 | 7:15 PM

Agreed: Yes, it is a socialistic move, and two days are not enough time and there should be no bailout, of course.

It's our money, not theirs, they don't have our permission to take it and give it to the banking business, who assuredly neither deserve it or are responsible enough to be trusted with it.

I listened today on CSPAN as senator after senator rejected the bailout. Of course I didn't hear all 100 senators. I hope part of that is because I tuned in when the debate seemed to be well under way. Some opposed the bailout unequivocally and without reserve. One read numerous e-mails from his middle class constituency all of which not only rejected this bailout but any kind of bailout. I hope there are enough responsible and sensible people in Congress to say a big "No" to this evil move from the administration.

Remember that the legislative branch is not the servant of the executive. It is a check and a balance against it.

Kudos to those who are truly representing the majority of the voters. I hope and pray that they will hold out tonight and not let a desire to go home and sleep pressure them into giving in. That would be infamous.

kjm1102 read my blog
Sep 27, 2008 | 1:28 AM

I too e-mailed my Federal cadre. I believe all of mine got through, well maybe not to the legislator himself but to their e-mail box.
I believe in empowerment, and to that end I did not tell them what I wanted them to do, I only asked that they read the US Constitution and "do what is right" and to up hold "that which they swore to up hold at their ingeneration.”
I can only hope that one of the 5 did as I suggested and spent an hour in quiet enlightened reading of this governing document and found, as I have, that it is up to the people of this country to determine its fortune and not its politicians.

richardcheney read my blog view my photos
Sep 28, 2008 | 1:01 AM

Yes, because any government action to influence a private enterprise is socialist. I do not believe the government should act to turn around an issue that began with ignorant private enterprise acting as it did with results that were predictable. Therefore, answers to the other two questions are null and void. Shame on them. The market has learned nothing of the experiences of the past to allow runaway financial trasnactions by people not qualified to engage in them. If that means the market fails, so be it. We'll build it again and watch it crumble again because we just do not learn. But government ought to stay out of the fray. Not their job and not with our money. We are too far in debt to continue this madness.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




NinevehDinha

I start off every morning waking up our viewers, and it's always a pleasure! I'm happy to be part of Fox 13's Good Day Utah team. I anchor bright and early from 5 to 6 a.m. You can also catch me on the streets reporting for both GDU and Live at 11.

Member Since: 2/20/2007