Norcal2's Blog

Ya the money might of been spent better somewhere else. But the truth is they have plenty of money to spread around as they see fit.
If the real issue is about kids growing up in a stable family enviroment. Then why not crusade against the marriages and non married couples that are creating these children to broken homes. Try to change the laws at the root of the problem.
Im not sure where to start with making it harder to procreate??? But how about making marriage harder to get out of.

Im still scratching my head with how this leagal definition of Marriage between a man and a woman is going to help the kids in this country become moral and upstanding citizens.

I mean there are so many other things you should be teaching your kids. And sheltering is not one of them.

please remember that the voters of California already voted once that they wanted marriage left between a man and a woman. A California court overturned the voice of the people. This is about keeping the court in check. Gay/lesbian couples already have ample protection under California law. California has also passed a law banning the use of words such as mother, mom, husband, wife, father, dad or any other words which imply gender regarding the heads of families in text books in the state. Now tell me that the traditional family is not under attack! Decesions of this nature set a dangerous court precedent for all of us! Wake up folks!! Our country is changing before our eyes and it isnt for the better!

I love the argument about starving children. Let's use it all the time. When you buy a new TV, are you choosing a TV over feeding hungry children? Are you sitting at home when you could be working in a food kitchen? What about that coat you're wearing, don't you think you can give that coat to a child that has no coat? What about that trip to McDonald's? Your cell phone? Are you considering all the money you could be giving to the starving children? What about education, why should I be putting myself into debt earning a degree when I could be putting myself into debt feeding the children?

The LDS church is a powerhouse in the world of charity. It asks it's members to forgo two meals every month and give the money to the welfare program. What do you do?

Just to be clear the LDS church has only contributed $2,078.97, all other monies are from donations made by the membership. Let's not mention all the other churches that have given money, after all this is an interfaith issue.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=4648552

Powerhouse you missed the point. It isn't about the church not helping or helping, what they donate that does good or anything about how good or bad they are, it is about THIS money being better spent elsewhere than spent on trying to influence California voters who nutoriously vote what is best for their state. That money will have zero impact.

In fact when a church, and church tries to control the voting booth they take a chance of getting the opposite of what they want. That is what happens when voters feel like outsiders are trying to influence.

one thing that isn't mentioned why we need to get this and others to pass to describe a marrage between a man and a women is ordained of god is that if it doesn't pass and gay marrage stands in different states it will be a direct attack on the constition "freedom of religion" and besides that didn't the nation as a whole vote on bill describeing a marrage between a man and a women so my question to all where does the constition state that state courts can over rule the constition federal laws or the supreme courts