MyFox
 

onestand's Blog

by onestand from West Jordan

Last Post 6 days, 21 hours Ago


I can't believe this is in the news constantly.  Can you believe a man can marry a man and a women marry a women.  Wow, that is so scary, right?  It's like an epidemic, I mean if we allow this to happen, when are we going to catch the same fever!

Frankly,  it's not any of our business!  If other people want to be "gay" as society states, who are any of us to say it is wrong!  What happens in someone else's house between two consenting adults, is their business!  Let's say you or anyone else on this earth say, "this is a sin, and we can't let this happen." 

Two things come to mind...

1.  Judge not, least ye be judged.

2. Get your own house in order.

22 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 22
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
tooshortdog read my blog view my photos
Oct 10, 2008 | 8:29 AM

OOH! This is going to be a hot one... I dont have much to say yet... I am sure I will after a few others have their own say.

extremedude read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 9:32 AM

yes in a you are right we souldn't judge but on the other hand get your house in order i can name several societies that were distroyed becouse homosexuality was one of the many sinful actions that was being practiced, and the many text i want to post is this from anouther website that states why we have to stop this gay marrage bill from happning.
Having tolerance without condoning.
We can love someone while still maintaining and advocating our standards and beliefs. Unless Proposition 8 passes, California society will soon undergo a profound change in its basic understanding of marriage and family life.
That will affect everyone in numerous ways. Over time, greater acceptance of nontraditional marriage will be demanded of all people. This could impact the ability of any religion to teach and practice its beliefs. Proposition 8 will not hurt gays.
In California, the law provides for marriage-related benefits to be given to civil unions and domestic partnerships. Proposition 8 does not diminish these benefits. Failure to pass Proposition 8 will hurt children.
If gay marriage remains legal, public schools will put it on equal footing with traditional marriage. Children will likely receive “age appropriate” information about sexual relations within heterosexual and homosexual marriages. Failure to pass Proposition 8 will hurt churches.
The court’s decision will

extremedude read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 9:32 AM

yes in a you are right we souldn't judge but on the other hand get your house in order i can name several societies that were distroyed becouse homosexuality was one of the many sinful actions that was being practiced, and the many text i want to post is this from anouther website that states why we have to stop this gay marrage bill from happning.
Having tolerance without condoning.
We can love someone while still maintaining and advocating our standards and beliefs. Unless Proposition 8 passes, California society will soon undergo a profound change in its basic understanding of marriage and family life.
That will affect everyone in numerous ways. Over time, greater acceptance of nontraditional marriage will be demanded of all people. This could impact the ability of any religion to teach and practice its beliefs. Proposition 8 will not hurt gays.
In California, the law provides for marriage-related benefits to be given to civil unions and domestic partnerships. Proposition 8 does not diminish these benefits. Failure to pass Proposition 8 will hurt children.
If gay marriage remains legal, public schools will put it on equal footing with traditional marriage. Children will likely receive “age appropriate” information about sexual relations within heterosexual and homosexual marriages. Failure to pass Proposition 8 will hurt churches.
The court’s decision will

utahmen
Oct 10, 2008 | 10:22 AM

Extremedude, you said you can name several societies that were destroyed because of homosexuality but you failed to do so. I'm interested in which ones they are and if you'll also please tell me where I can find the proof they were destroyed for that reason, I'd appreciate it.

disneyfreek1977
Oct 10, 2008 | 10:24 AM

Remember Sodom and Gomorrah? Perhaps there are those who dispute whether it actually happened. These cities were DESTROYED because of their immoral way of living. I don't understand how anyone who says they believe what the Bible teaches can still think that marriage between gay couples should be legal. This country was founded on a common morality, which is hanging by a thread. What will be next? Legal marriage to children (to protect people like the FLDS church)? How about marriage to your dog? I think our Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves! Some things are just WRONG! There is no gray area here. Right is right, and WRONG is WRONG! We need to stand up for what is right. This law should not have been passed in the first place. 'Love the sinner, but hate the sin,' comes to mind. I can like a person without thinking they are evil. Being gay doesn't make a person bad. I believe they are good people. It is just possible to be mislead. Too possible.

spunky4 read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 10:38 AM

Wow I have posted my own blog on this and I would like to know from extremedude as well what socities he is talking about, he sent me the same reply to my block.Exactly how do we know what is in the Bible is true anyway? I have yet to see a copy of the original that offers proof. No worries I am a Christian! We are taught that this is a crime against god as well but I want to and do beleive that my God is a loving understanding God. Why would he protect a no polite words come to mind other than a working girl but yet on the same hand we are taught that we will be punished for marrying the same sex. If you ask me religion for the most not matter what one it is is a contradiction. Honestly think about it he says not to hurt others but if what we are taught about his rath at the end. Why would he himself hurt us when his teachings are different. Call me ignorant but I will follow the God that is forgiving and non punishing.

extremedude read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 12:21 PM

it is ironic that you don't want to belive in the bible when you say you are christian ;) lol!!! all i have to say is soddom and gohmora

disneyfreek1977
Oct 10, 2008 | 12:44 PM

I do believe that God is a forgiving and an understanding being. But he also expects us to follow his commandments. We are blessed with weaknesses to challenge us and promote growth. He cannot be expected to let His children slide when others make it through the fire though. He must be just. But He is also merciful. But, as I stated earlier, right is right. I'm sorry -- I have gotten on a tangent here that would probably be better suited for the religion/faith section! I do believe we are all entitled to our own beliefs.

spunky4 read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 12:47 PM

No extremedude I do belive in the bible all I am saying is how do we know for sure that everything in it is true? so LOL.We have little proof of anything from that long ago, yes we have some.All I am saying is what if we are all wrong in what we think. Did God not intend for us to live in harmony? How we can do this when we are outcasting others who are different? My point as a christian is that no matter how different someone is they are equal to me and deserve no more or no less than I do. It is up to one and only one to decide the fate of others and that is God.Let the homosexual community of their marriges because if it is a crime again god then what do you care they will be punished. By the way you stated the children would suffer from proposition 8 please explain.

utahmen
Oct 10, 2008 | 12:56 PM

If you want to take the bible, specifically Genesis, at face value, nowhere does it say the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because their inhabitants accepted homosexuality. It says the men of Sodom told Lot to bring the angels to them that they may know them. Lot then turns around and tells them they can have his two virgin daughters instead. Even if "know them" means have sex with them, the bible still doesn't say that's the reason God destroyed the city. After all, God had already decided to do it before this incident with Lot and the 2 angels ever took place. I too believe we're all entitled to our own beliefs, I simply prefer to believe things that have a bit more basis in fact, rather than someone else's interpretation that's intended to scare everyone else into seeing things their way.

Outryder read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 1:04 PM

this is a hot debate because of the following two questions--
1. how can the government seek to establish marriage, which is an inherently religious order?? does this jeoparodise the separation of church and state and the first amendment??
2. if this amendment is passed, will the government have grounds to require that gay/lesbian marriage be solemnised in each church?? what if said church is opposed to this??

when any government seeks to regulate morality, it treads on dangerous ground. the lines between church and state become blurry, and laws are passed that are unjust and very difficult to enforce. morality is by its nature subjective as it is emperical. how can a law which feigns objectivity be so when its matter is of a subjective nature?? in other words, since moral behaviour is a result of one's decisions and observations and varies from person to person, how can a law be equally applied when it deals with this kind of subjectivity??

as for my stance on the issue, i believe that from a biblical standpoint (since marriage is by definition a religious order) MUST consist of a man and a woman. this should not, however, encroach on legal arrangements that bind two people together. this is of a civil nature, and therefore must offer equal rights and legal benefits for homosexuals and heterosexuals alike. the state cannot marry as it has no authority to do so. the state cannot define marriage as it has no authority to do so. the definition of marriage must be left up to the churches and not incorporated into state proceedings.

utahmen
Oct 10, 2008 | 1:33 PM

Outryder, I respectfully disagree with your assertion that marriage is an inherently religious order. Legal marriage was not born of religion, it was created as a means to prove a man's property rights, i.e. who a specific woman, or women, "belonged" to. If society/government wants to define marriage as a strictly religious order, "legal" marriages should be disolved and heterosexual couples can jump through all the same legal hoops and spend the same amount of money currently required of gay couples to protect their relationships and assets.

Mktavish read my blog view my photos
Oct 10, 2008 | 7:46 PM

I think both Outryder and utahmen made goods points there. And I think you both have pretty similar veiws , compared to extreme's

But why not take it a step further.
Instead of worrying about what killed Sodam and Gamora. Why not look at what could kill this civilization were in.
On top of many things ,excludeing same sex habbits. There is this one called population growth that Id like to elaborate on.

First a Parody : Have you all heard of the carbon offset tradeing?
In short , company A (that pollutes alot) Pays company B (that pollutes very little) For their offset below the national standard imposed of late.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now I know thats not a very nice way to view children. so im sure ill get some flamage there.
Anyways ... If those that want to procreate en`mass ... would realize!!! They need to sanctify the union of those that choose not to populate this planet.

So in short , If you do the math on even ... 6x6x6=216 ... And I wanted to add this other thing.
Bill Nye says.
"At the rate of consumption the USA uses. The world can sustain 2 billion people.

Outryder read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 9:01 PM

so, Mitkavish--have you ever read THE WANTING SEED by Anthony Burgess?? it deals very heavily in the socioethical question of homosexuality in an overpopulated world. i recommend this for anyone who wishes to explore that this issue further.

as for the nature of marriage, it is religious. we can read in the Bible about the marriage of Abraham and Sarah. we read about Jacob and his wives, and the formation of the Hebrew nation. if this was mandated by God, we can reasonably suppose that God married Adam and Eve, Seth to his wife; Moses to his wife; and on down the line to David, Solomon, and on into the times of Christ during Roman occupation of Israel. in ancient Jewish society, marriage was regarded as a righteous union, ordained of God.

this tradition continued through the spread of Christianity through Europe and onward into the Americas. marriage during these times was a political institution as well as a religious institution because there was no separation of church and state until 1791, when the Bill of Rights was ratified. with this separation came a renunciation of state authority to define or mandate marriage. notwithstanding this, however, cultural predominance prevailed, and traditional views of marriage were honoured.

it was not until after the effects of the sexual revolution were felt that homosexuality came into the mainstream. since perhaps the 1980s, it has become increasingly fashionable. the majority of the resistance that has arisen with this movement has been due to repulsion, so homosexuals seek equal protection under the law. C

Mktavish read my blog view my photos
Oct 10, 2008 | 9:36 PM

I read sometimes ... usually when Im donating.
But latley I just have to build shiot , so I dont have time. Helped build BodyWorlds for one.
And thanx for the history lesson ... really , I live on the history channel when I can watch it.

I think you totally bypassed the math lesson I was trying to give. ???

Outryder read my blog
Oct 10, 2008 | 11:05 PM

the math makes sense. if overpopulation is a concern, the lack of children by homosexual couples would offset a heterosexual couple deciding to have four kids. adoption, i believe, also addresses this issue in part. no flamage from me here. i knew what you meant.

Mktavish read my blog view my photos
Oct 11, 2008 | 11:01 AM

Ya I didnt think you were flaming me.
I guess maybe my real point wasnt made obvious.

There are more than 2 billion people on this planet. And with current USA population (1/2 billion ???) Consumeing the recources of the planet that can sustain this quality of life for 2 billion people. Then where does that leave the rest of the people , And what maybe are they going to do about it?

So the Offsets of samesex to heterosex marriage , was more just a partial solution to the problem that I didnt make clear I guess.

dracco73 read my blog
Oct 12, 2008 | 1:39 AM

I say take your bible back to your private life where it belongs. It has no place in public. If you choose to believe, FINE! Just keep it out of the law. Morals have no place in law. Ethics yes, morals... NO!

Mktavish read my blog view my photos
Oct 12, 2008 | 10:54 AM

There is nothing wrong with dictateing morality and ethics. When it is fair and just.
But dont you think there are far more issues that should be dealt with.
Top of the list should be greed right now.

dracco73 read my blog
Oct 13, 2008 | 12:31 PM

MKTAVISH,

There is absolutely everything wrong with dcitating morals if the 1st Amendment prevents it. Would you be willing to adhere to the tenets or morals of the Muslim religion? Would you be willing to have the women in your family wear burkas? If you want a theoacracy, go live in the middle east. This is a secular society and laws respecting an establishment of religion are NOT ALLOWED!

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




onestand

hope

Member Since: 4/2/2008